<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Jan-Peter Homann</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.colormanagement.de/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.colormanagement.de</link>
	<description>on colormanagement for the standardized print production</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Book Digital Color Management by iLico</title>
		<link>http://www.colormanagement.de/book-digital-color-management#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>iLico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 19:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colormanagement.de/?page_id=45#comment-71</guid>
		<description>hello Jan,

I am a studying.
can you indicate sources about the mathematical background of color management, especially DeviceLink generation?

cheers,

iLico</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello Jan,</p>
<p>I am a studying.<br />
can you indicate sources about the mathematical background of color management, especially DeviceLink generation?</p>
<p>cheers,</p>
<p>iLico</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Book Digital Color Management by homann</title>
		<link>http://www.colormanagement.de/book-digital-color-management#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>homann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 16:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colormanagement.de/?page_id=45#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Hello iLico,

Writing the third edition, I had the plan to publish a second book with step by step "recepts" for colormanagement to implement ISO 12647-2.
But as such book would need screenshots of about 20 differnt software solutions, a printed book would be outdated very fast.

For the 4. edition there will be no "Praxisband".

Regards
Jan-Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello iLico,</p>
<p>Writing the third edition, I had the plan to publish a second book with step by step &#8220;recepts&#8221; for colormanagement to implement ISO 12647-2.<br />
But as such book would need screenshots of about 20 differnt software solutions, a printed book would be outdated very fast.</p>
<p>For the 4. edition there will be no &#8220;Praxisband&#8221;.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Jan-Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Book Digital Color Management by iLico</title>
		<link>http://www.colormanagement.de/book-digital-color-management#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>iLico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colormanagement.de/?page_id=45#comment-69</guid>
		<description>hello Jan,

what does does "Praxisband", which is mentioned several times in the german edition of your book  refer to? is it another book?

cheers,

iLico</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello Jan,</p>
<p>what does does &#8220;Praxisband&#8221;, which is mentioned several times in the german edition of your book  refer to? is it another book?</p>
<p>cheers,</p>
<p>iLico</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Book Digital Color Management by Preparing to teach is a learning process &#124; Lukas Engqvist (Artcoach.se)</title>
		<link>http://www.colormanagement.de/book-digital-color-management#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Preparing to teach is a learning process &#124; Lukas Engqvist (Artcoach.se)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 13:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colormanagement.de/?page_id=45#comment-25</guid>
		<description>[...] like to thank Jan-Peter Homann who gave me permission to use some of his diagrams from the book Digital Color Management in my [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] like to thank Jan-Peter Homann who gave me permission to use some of his diagrams from the book Digital Color Management in my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Separation of RGB-images by Lukas Engqvist</title>
		<link>http://www.colormanagement.de/workflow/separation-of-rgb-images#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Lukas Engqvist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 13:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colormanagement.de/blog/?page_id=8#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the information about these profiles, I have been looking for a place to point people to when holding courses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the information about these profiles, I have been looking for a place to point people to when holding courses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Book Digital Color Management by homann</title>
		<link>http://www.colormanagement.de/book-digital-color-management#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>homann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 14:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colormanagement.de/?page_id=45#comment-17</guid>
		<description>To Go Jov,
EfI is (now) mentioned with Links to ColorProof XF and the Color Verifier on the start page.
Please see also further information on calibration and profile optimization at &lt;a href="http://www.colormanagement.de/workflow/proofing/" rel="nofollow"&gt;proofing&lt;/a&gt;
From my point of view, EfI ColorProof has today not a clear differentiation between calibration and and profile optimization. (This may change in future...)
Calibration should be bring the proofer for a defined media / ink combination to a "gold standard" defined by proofing system vendor or by the user.
If the proofing vendor delivers devicelink profiles optimized for simulating printing standards like FOGRA / PSO, GRACoL, SWOP on a calibrated system, the user has  to do the calibration ONCE (!!) and all printing standard simulations are spot on.
The  currenty available optimization in Efi Colorproof - so far as I know - has to be done for every combination of printing standard and ink / media combination.
If on a proofing system with a semimatte medium  three printing standards are simulated, the optimization in EfI Colorproof has to be done for all three combinations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Go Jov,<br />
EfI is (now) mentioned with Links to ColorProof XF and the Color Verifier on the start page.<br />
Please see also further information on calibration and profile optimization at <a href="http://www.colormanagement.de/workflow/proofing/" rel="nofollow">proofing</a><br />
From my point of view, EfI ColorProof has today not a clear differentiation between calibration and and profile optimization. (This may change in future&#8230;)<br />
Calibration should be bring the proofer for a defined media / ink combination to a &#8220;gold standard&#8221; defined by proofing system vendor or by the user.<br />
If the proofing vendor delivers devicelink profiles optimized for simulating printing standards like FOGRA / PSO, GRACoL, SWOP on a calibrated system, the user has  to do the calibration ONCE (!!) and all printing standard simulations are spot on.<br />
The  currenty available optimization in Efi Colorproof - so far as I know - has to be done for every combination of printing standard and ink / media combination.<br />
If on a proofing system with a semimatte medium  three printing standards are simulated, the optimization in EfI Colorproof has to be done for all three combinations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Proofing by Madhura Mahajan</title>
		<link>http://www.colormanagement.de/workflow/proofing#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Madhura Mahajan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 13:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colormanagement.de/blog/?page_id=18#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr. Hoffman,

Hello. We have an Epson Proofer 7900. It has a star proof rip. How do I know whether it is with or without optimised Device Link Profiles and calibrated for PSO or SWOP or GRACol

Thanks,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Hoffman,</p>
<p>Hello. We have an Epson Proofer 7900. It has a star proof rip. How do I know whether it is with or without optimised Device Link Profiles and calibrated for PSO or SWOP or GRACol</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Book Digital Color Management by Go Jov</title>
		<link>http://www.colormanagement.de/book-digital-color-management#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Go Jov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 15:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colormanagement.de/?page_id=45#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I am surprised, that author of this book never mention EFI. 
i like to what is reason?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am surprised, that author of this book never mention EFI.<br />
i like to what is reason?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PDF/X-1a by homann</title>
		<link>http://www.colormanagement.de/workflow/pdfx-1a#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>homann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 20:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colormanagement.de/blog/?page_id=13#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Dear Ecir Hany,
The PDF/X-1a:2003 standard is available, through http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=39938

There is no free version. Based on PDF/X-1a are the GWG specs which could be downloaded free at http://www.gwg.org/GWGversion4.phtml

If you have any questions concerning the usage of the GWG specs, I recommend the GWG forum at http://forum.gwg.org/ (currently a little bit quiet...)

Best regards
Jan-Peter Homann</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Ecir Hany,<br />
The PDF/X-1a:2003 standard is available, through <a href="http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=39938" rel="nofollow">http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=39938</a></p>
<p>There is no free version. Based on PDF/X-1a are the GWG specs which could be downloaded free at <a href="http://www.gwg.org/GWGversion4.phtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.gwg.org/GWGversion4.phtml</a></p>
<p>If you have any questions concerning the usage of the GWG specs, I recommend the GWG forum at <a href="http://forum.gwg.org/" rel="nofollow">http://forum.gwg.org/</a> (currently a little bit quiet&#8230;)</p>
<p>Best regards<br />
Jan-Peter Homann</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PDF/X-1a by Ecir Hana</title>
		<link>http://www.colormanagement.de/workflow/pdfx-1a#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Ecir Hana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colormanagement.de/blog/?page_id=13#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr. Homann,

please, I have one question - where can I get PDF/X-1a:2003 standard? Do I have to buy it? I'm asking because I can freely get PDF 1.7 reference from Adobe site so I thought it would be possible to obtain the former spec as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Homann,</p>
<p>please, I have one question - where can I get PDF/X-1a:2003 standard? Do I have to buy it? I&#8217;m asking because I can freely get PDF 1.7 reference from Adobe site so I thought it would be possible to obtain the former spec as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
